3
|
Considering Evidence
· State the findings from Christina and Declan’s evidence:The leaf with no carbon dioxide had starch/no starch.
The leaf with no water had starch/no starch. The leaf with no light had starch/no starch. The control leaf had starch/no starch.
· State the conclusion:
Plants need ________ to make starch.
Evaluating Evidence
· Suggest an improvement to the investigation.
The investigation could have been improved if… |
4
|
Considering Evidence
· State Christina and Declan’s evidence:The leaf with no carbon dioxide had starch/no starch.
The leaf with no water had starch/no starch. The leaf with no light had starch/no starch. The control leaf had starch/no starch.
· Explain your conclusion using simple scientific ideas. Plants need ________ and ________ to make starch.
Evaluating Evidence
· Suggest improvements with reasons.
|
5
|
Considering Evidence
· Describe Christina and Declan’s evidence:The leaf with no carbon dioxide had starch/no starch.
The leaf with no water had starch/no starch. The leaf with no light had starch/no starch. The control leaf had starch/no starch.
· State the conclusion:
Plants need ________ and ________ to make starch.
· Explain your conclusion using scientific words.
Evaluating Evidence
· Suggest how the investigation could be improved.
· Suggest practical improvements.
|
7
|
Considering Evidence
· Make a generalisation based on Christina and Declan’s evidence.
· Explain your conclusion using scientific ideas to explain the evidence in detail.
· Identify any anomalies in the results.
Evaluating Evidence
· Evaluate the evidence: suggest some strengths and weaknesses with the evidence.
· Decide if the data is sufficient to support the conclusion.
· Explain in detail how the method could be improved.
|
8
|
Considering Evidence
· Make a generalisation based on Christina and Declan’s evidence.
· Explain your conclusion using scientific ideas to explain the evidence in detail.
· State your conclusion. Make a quantitative generalisation based on the results.
· Explain any anomalies in the results.
· Discuss how certain you can be of the conclusions you have made
Evaluating Evidence
· Evaluate the evidence: suggest a range of strengths and weaknesses with the evidence.
· Explain in detail how the method could be improved based on your evaluation.
· Discuss if the data is sufficient to support the conclusion.
|
EP
|
Considering Evidence
As for Level 8 but also:
· Explain the relationship scientifically, where appropriate, offering alternative views, using scientific ideas and mathematical units appropriately.
· Discuss how certain you can be of the evidence.
Evaluating Evidence
· Evaluate the evidence: suggest a range of strengths and weaknesses with the evidence.
· Discuss how certain you are about the evidence.
· Explain in detail how the method could be improved based on your evaluation.
· Discuss if the data is sufficient to support the conclusion, explaining what additional could be collected.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment